Bermuda grass plant named &#39;BAR 1CD3&#39;

ABSTRACT

This invention relates to a new and distinct variety of Bermuda grass plant named ‘BAR 1CD3’, which is primarily characterized by rapid lateral spread that forms a dense sod, minimal thatch, and minimal vertical growth that requires very little mowing, and producing very few seed heads, if any, is disclosed.

GENUS AND SPECIES

Cynodon dactylon (L.) Persoon

VARIETY DENOMINATION

‘BAR 1CD3’

BACKGROUND OF THE NEW PLANT

The present invention relates to a new and distinct Bermuda grass plant designated ‘BAR 1CD3’ and botanically known as Cynodon dactylon (L.) Persoon. This new Bermuda grass was developed from research germplasm collections near Sydney, Australia in 1997. Germplasm selected from the 1997 evaluation was then evaluated in turf plots in southern France from 1998 to 1999. The most promising germplasm was selected and designated ‘BAR 1CD3’. ‘BAR 1CD3’ was then sent to Virginia for further evaluation and selection. A selection was made in 2000 in Virginia for its turf quality. The present invention has been found to be stable and reproduce true to type through successive asexual propagations.

Plant Breeder's Rights for this plant were applied for in The Netherlands in 2001 and granted in 2003. The Netherlands Plant Breeder's Rights application was given the title ‘BARAZUR’. ‘BAR 1CD3’ has not been made publicly available more than one year prior to filing of this application.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The following are the most outstanding and distinguishing characteristics of this new cultivar when grown under normal horticultural practices in Raleigh, N.C., Savelletri di Fasano, Italy, Las Cruces, N.Mex., and Wharton, Tex.

-   -   1. Rapid lateral spread that forms a dense sod;     -   2. Minimal thatch;     -   3. Minimal vertical growth that requires very little mowing; and     -   4. Very low number of inflorescences (seed heads) produced.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PHOTOGRAPH AND FIGURE

This new Bermuda grass plant is illustrated by the accompanying photograph taken in Wharton, Tex., on May 6, 2009.

FIG. 1 shows a photo of the invention 30 days after mowing.

FIG. 2 shows a tree diagram of the genetic linkage distance of ‘BAR 1CD3’ with five other Bermuda grass cultivars.

DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW VARIETY

The following description of ‘BAR 1CD3’ is based on observations taken during the 2003 to 2009 growing seasons in Raleigh, N.C., Savelletri di Fasano, Italy, Las Cruces, N.Mex., and Wharton, Tex.

DETAILED BOTANICAL DESCRIPTION

-   Classification:     -   -   Family.—Poaceae.         -   Botanical.—Cynodon dactylon (L.) Persoon.         -   Common name.—Bermuda grass.         -   Variety name.—‘BAR 1CD3’. -   Shoot:     -   -   Density (cm ⁻²).—7.3 to 7.4. -   Root:     -   -   Rhizome and shoot density (cm cm ⁻²).—4.4 to 4.5. -   Internode:     -   -   Length (cm).—0.9 to 1.1.         -   Diameter (mm).—1.5 to 1.6. -   Blade:     -   -   Leaf blade width (mm).—1.6 to 1.8. -   Table 1 shows a visual assessment and comparison of ‘BAR 1CD3’ with     several commercially available Bermuda grass varieties conducted in     Savelletri di Fasano, Italy between 2003 and 2006. The experimental     design was a randomized block with four replications. Plot size was     3 m×2 m (0.5 m alleyways between plots). Planting date was Aug. 8,     2003 by sprigging (sprigs in rows) or seeding (1.5 kg 100 m² seed     rate). Mowing height of the plot was 30 mm from 2003 to 2005 and 18     mm from 2006 on. The fertilization of the plot included 3.0 kg 100     m⁻² nitrogen per growing season (April to October) and 2.5 kg 100     m⁻² potassium per growing season (April to October). Column one     shows the cultivar name, column two shows the propagule type     (seeded/vegetative), column three shows the percentage of ground     cover during establishment of the grass as of Oct. 11, 2003, column     four shows the percent green color and the fall color retention on     Dec. 3, 2003, column five shows the spring greenup by percent green     color on Mar. 14, 2004, column six shows the spring greenup by     percent green color on Apr. 15, 2004, column seven shows the spring     greenup by percent green color on May 25, 2004 and row fourteen     shows the LSD with an alpha of 0.05.

TABLE 1 Visual Assessment: Percent Ground Cover During Establishment, Fall Color Retention (2003) and Spring Greenup (2004) Fall Percent Color Percent Green Color Ground Re- Spring Greenup-2004 Cover tention Mar. Apr. May Propagule Oct. 11, Dec. 3, 14, 15, 25, Cultivar Type 2003 2003 2004 2004 2004 Common seeded 100 90 15 61 100 Princess 77 seeded 99 91 55 89 100 Riviera seeded 100 89 56 89 100 Yukon seeded 88 39 20 91 100 Tifway 419 vegetative 69 91 70 95 100 Tifdwarf vegetative 30 90 10 38 84 Santa Ana vegetative 71 92 65 95 100 Tiftsport vegetative 33 91 60 83 99 ‘BAR 1CD3’ vegetative 40 68 50 66 95 LSD (P = 0.05) 21 6 6 19 12

-   Table 2 below shows a visual assessment and comparison of ‘BAR 1CD3’     with several commercially available Bermuda grass varieties. The     comparison was made in the spring of 2006 in Savelletri di Fasano,     Italy between 2003 and 2006. The experimental design was a     randomized block with four replications. Plot size was 3 m×2 m (0.5     m alleyways between plots). Planting date was Aug. 8, 2003 by     sprigging (sprigs in rows) or seeding (1.5 kg 100 m² seed rate).     Mowing height of the plot was 30 mm from 2003 to 2005 and 18 mm from     2006 on. The fertilization of the plot included 3.0 kg 100 m⁻²     nitrogen per growing season (April to October) and 2.5 kg 100 m⁻²     potassium per growing season (April to October). Column one shows     the cultivar name, column two shows the percent green color on Mar.     2, 2006, column three shows the percent green color on Mar. 15,     2006, column four shows the percent green color on Mar. 30, 2006,     and row thirteen shows the LSD with an alpha of 0.05

TABLE 2 Spring Greenup 2006 Percent Green Color Cultivar Mar. 2, 2006 Mar. 15, 2006 Mar. 30, 2006 Common 0 5 61 Princess 0 0 60 Riviera 0 10 79 Yukon 0 6 75 Tifway 419 1 8 84 Tifdwarf 0 0 63 Santa Ana 0 9 78 Tifsport 0 0 74 ‘BAR 1CD3’ 0 0 74 LSD (P = 0.05) 2 4 10

-   Table 3 below shows a visual assessment and comparison of ‘BAR 1CD3’     with several commercially available Bermuda grass varieties. The     comparison was made in the fall of 2004, 2005, and 2006 in     Savelletri di Fasano, Italy between 2003 and 2006. The experimental     design was a randomized block with four replications. Plot size was     3 m×2 m (0.5 m alleyways between plots). Planting date was Aug. 8,     2003 by sprigging (sprigs in rows) or seeding (1.5 kg 100 m² seed     rate). Mowing height of the plot was 30 mm from 2003 to 2005 and 18     mm from 2006 on. The fertilization of the plot included 3.0 kg 100     m⁻² nitrogen per growing season (April to October) and 2.5 kg 100     m⁻² potassium per growing season (April to October). Column one     shows the cultivar name, column two shows the turf quality (9=best     and 1=poorest) on Sep. 23, 2004, column three shows the turf quality     (9=best and 1=poorest) on Sep. 29, 2005, column four shows the turf     color on Sep. 23, 2004 (9=dark green and 1=light green), and row     thirteen shows the LSD with an alpha of 0.05.

TABLE 3 Visual Assessment: Turf Quality and Turf Color Color Turf Quality (9 = dark green, (9 = best, 1 = poorest) 1 = light green) Cultivar Sep. 23, 2004 Sep. 29, 2005 Sep. 23, 2004 Common 5.4 4.0 5.3 Princess 77 7.1 6.0 7.0 Riviera 6.8 4.8 6.8 Yukon 7.3 5.5 6.8 Tifway 419 7.8 5.8 7.6 Tifdwarf 7.8 7.0 7.8 Santa Ana 7.5 6.0 7.5 Tifsport 7.8 6.1 8.0 ‘BAR 1CD3’ 8.3 7.3 8.4 LSD (P = 0.05) 0.4 0.5 0.4

-   Table 4 below shows a comparison of morphological characteristics     recorded in 2004. The comparison was made in Savelletri di Fasano,     Italy between 2003 and 2006. The experimental design was a     randomized block with four replications. Plot size was 3 m×2 m (0.5     m alleyways between plots). Planting date was Aug. 8, 2003 by     sprigging (sprigs in rows) or seeding (1.5 kg 100 m² seed rate).     Mowing height of the plot was 30 mm from 2003 to 2005 and 18 mm from     2006 on. The fertilization of the plot included 3.0 kg 100 m⁻²     nitrogen per growing season (April to October) and 2.5 kg 100 m⁻²     potassium per growing season (April to October). Column one shows     the cultivar name, column two shows the shoot density (cm⁻²) (one 70     mm core sample per plot), column three shows the rhizome and stolon     density (cm cm⁻²) (one 70 mm core sample per plot), column four     shows the internode length (cm) (20 internodes were measured per     plot), column five shows the internode diameter (mm) (20 internodes     were measured per plot), column six shows the leaf blade width (mm)     (20 fully expanded leaves were measured per plot), and row twelve     shows the LSD with an alpha of 0.05.

TABLE 4 Comparative Turfgrass Morphological Characteristics Recorded in 2004 Rhizome Shoot and Stolon Internode Internode Leaf Blade Density Density Length Diameter Width Cultivar (cm⁻²) (cm cm⁻²) (cm) (mm) (mm) Common 3.6 0.4 1.4 1.3 1.5 Princess 77 6.6 0.8 1.2 0.9 1.4 Riviera 6.7 0.9 1.4 1.3 1.3 Yukon 5.1 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.4 Tifway 419 5.9 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.3 Tifdwarf 9.4 2.2 1.2 1.3 1.2 Santa Ana 8.2 3.0 1.5 1.4 1.1 Tifsport 11.2 2.7 1.8 1.4 1.2 ‘BAR 1CD3’ 7.3 4.5 1.1 1.6 1.8 LSD (P = 0.05) 2.7 1.8 0.3 0.4 0.2

-   Table 5 below shows a comparison of morphological characteristics     recorded in 2005. The comparison was made in Savelletri di Fasano,     Italy between 2003 and 2006. The experimental design was a     randomized block with four replications. Plot size was 3 m×2 m (0.5     m alleyways between plots). Planting date was Aug. 8, 2003 by     sprigging (sprigs in rows) or seeding (1.5 kg 100 m² seed rate).     Mowing height of the plot was 30 mm from 2003 to 2005 and 18 mm from     2006 on. The fertilization of the plot included 3.0 kg 100 m⁻²     nitrogen per growing season (April to October) and 2.5 kg 100 m⁻²     potassium per growing season (April to October). Column one shows     the cultivar name, column two shows the shoot density (cm⁻²) (one 70     mm core sample per plot), column three shows the rhizome and stolon     density (cm cm ⁻²) (one 70 mm core sample per plot), column four     shows the internode length (cm) (20 internodes were measured per     plot), column five shows the internode diameter (mm) (20 internodes     were measured per plot), column six shows the leaf blade width (mm)     (20 fully expanded leaves were measured per plot), and row twelve     shows the LSD with an alpha of 0.05.

TABLE 5 Comparative Turfgrass Morphological Characteristics Recorded In 2005 Rhizome Shoot and Stolon Internode Internode Leaf Blade Density Density Length Diameter Width Cultivar (cm⁻²) (cm cm⁻²) (cm) (mm) (mm) Common 3.7 0.2 1.3 1.7 1.8 Princess 77 9.7 0.7 1.2 0.7 1.4 Riviera 5.4 0.4 1.0 1.1 1.4 Yukon 6.0 0.9 1.7 1.5 1.7 Tifway 419 5.6 1.6 1.2 1.6 1.4 Tifdwarf 10.5 2.7 1.1 1.1 1.2 Santa Ana 13.1 2.9 1.2 1.5 1.0 ‘BAR 1CD3’ 7.4 4.4 0.9 1.5 1.6 Tifsport 12.8 2.8 1.4 1.4 1.1 LSD (P = 0.05) 3.8 1.1 0.8 0.4 0.1

-   Table 6 shows the average plant heights (cm) after 56 days and 77     days without mowing the plots on May 6, 2009 and May 27, 2009. The     date of planting was Jun. 13, 2008 in Wharton, Tex. Column one shows     the cultivar name, column two shows the plant height after 56 days     (cm), column three shows the plant height after 77 days (cm), and     row ten shows the LSD with an alpha of 0.05. The statistical     analysis is based on eight observations per plot. All varieties in     Table 6 are vegetatively propagated.

TABLE 6 Average Plant Height (cm) After 56 Days And 77 Days Without Mowing The Plots. Planting Date Jun. 13, 2008 56 days 77 days May 6, 2009 May 27, 2009 Cultivar (cm) (cm) ‘BAR 1CD3’ 6.91 14.61 Tifton 419 10.72 17.70 Plateau 12.86 17.86 Patriot 14.84 23.81 Celebration 16.59 31.91 LSD (P = 0.05) 1.05 1.39

-   Table 7 shows a comparison of the genetic color, leaf texture, and     number of seed heads. Data was collected from plots planted in the     summer of 2007 in Raleigh, N.C. Column one shows the cultivar name,     column two shows the propagule type, column three shows the genetic     color on Sep. 19, 2007 with (9=dark green and 1=light green), column     four shows the genetic color on Oct. 5, 2007 with (9=dark green and     1=light green), column five shows the genetic color in September,     2008 with (9=dark green and 1=light green), column six shows the     leaf texture on Oct. 5, 2007 with a score of nine (9) equaling the     finest texture, column seven shows the leaf texture in September,     2008 with a score of nine (9) equaling the finest texture, column     eight shows the number of seed heads on Oct. 7, 2007 with a score of     nine (9) equaling no seed heads produced and one (1) equaling the     highest number of seed heads produced, column nine shows the number     of seed heads on Jul. 21, 2008 with a score of nine (9) equaling no     seed heads produced and one (1) equaling the highest number of seed     heads produced, column ten shows the number of seed heads in Oct.     26, 2008 with a score of nine (9) equaling no seed heads were     produced and one (1) equaling the highest number of seed heads     produced, and column eleven shows the average number of seeds heads     for 2007 and 2008, with a score of nine (9) equaling no seed heads     were produced and one (1) equaling the highest number of seed heads     produced. Rows 14 through 16 show the statistical analyses of the     data in Table 7, including the LSD with an alpha of 0.05, the     standard deviation, and Coefficient of Variation (CV).

TABLE 7 Shows a Comparison of the Average Genetic Color, Leaf Texture and Number of Seed Heads in 2007 and 2008 Leaf Texture Genetic Color (9 = finest (9 = darkest green) texture) Sep- Sep- tem- tem- Propagule Sep. 19, Oct. 5, ber of Oct. 5, ber of Entry Type 2007 2007 2008 2007 2008 ‘BAR 1CD3’ vegetative 8.3 8.0 8.0 9.0 9.0 Riviera seeded 6.0 5.7 6.3 7.0 6.7 Princess 77 seeded 7.0 6.3 7.0 7.7 7.3 Midlawn vegetative 7.0 6.3 6.0 7.3 9.0 Tifway vegetative 8.0 7.3 8.0 8.3 9.0 Premier vegetative 8.3 7.0 7.7 9.0 8.7 Sunsport seeded 6.3 5.0 5.3 6.7 5.3 Patriot vegetative 9.0 8.0 8.3 8.0 8.3 Yukon seeded 6.7 6.3 7.3 6.7 6.7 Tifton 11 vegetative 8.3 7.3 7.3 7.7 7.3 LSD (P = 0.05) 0.8 1.2 0.9 0.8 1.1 Standard Deviation 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.7 CV 7.13 11.28 8.1 6.73 10.1 Average Number of Number of Seed Heads Seed (9 = no seed heads) Heads Propagule Oct. 7, Jul. 21, Oct. 26, 2007- Entry Type 2007 2008 2008 2008 ‘BAR 1CD3’ vegetative 8.7 9.0 9.0 8.9 Riviera seeded 7.7 6.7 7.7 7.3 Princess 77 seeded 5.7 4.0 6.0 5.2 Midlawn vegetative 8.3 7.3 9.0 8.2 Tifway vegetative 8.3 7.0 9.0 8.1 Premier vegetative 8.0 8.7 8.7 8.4 Sunsport seeded 4.0 3.3 5.7 4.3 Patriot vegetative 7.3 9.0 6.7 7.7 Yukon seeded 7.7 5.7 8.0 7.1 Tifton 11 vegetative 8.7 8.3 9.0 8.7 LSD (P = 0.05) 1.1 1.1 1.5 0.8 Standard Deviation 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.5 CV 10.47 12 13.17 7.44

-   Table 8 shows a non-replicated comparison of turf quality and     genetic color. Data was collected in the summer and fall of 2008     from plots planted on Jun. 13, 2008 in Wharton, Tex. Column one     shows the cultivar name, column two shows the turf quality (9=best     and 1=poorest) on Jul. 11, 2008, column three shows the turf quality     (9=best and 1=poorest) on Jul. 22, 2008, column four shows the turf     quality (9=best and 1=poorest) on Aug. 29, 2008, column five column     the turf quality (9=best and 1=poorest) on Sep. 19, 2008, column six     shows the turf quality (9=best and 1=poorest) on Oct. 2, 2008,     column seven shows the average turf quality, column eight shows the     genetic color on Jul. 11, 2008 (9=dark green and 1=light green),     column nine shows the genetic color on Jul. 22, 2008 (9=dark green     and 1=light green), column ten shows the genetic color on Aug. 29,     2008 (9=dark green and 1=light green), column eleven shows the     genetic color on Sep. 19, 2008 (9=dark green and 1=light green),     column twelve shows the genetic color on Oct. 2, 2008 (9=dark green     and 1=light green), and column thirteen shows the average genetic     color.

TABLE 8 Comparison of Turf Quality and Genetic Color Data is from Wharton, Texas. Planting date: Jun. 13, 2008 Turf Quality (9 = best turf quality) Jul. 11, Jul. 22, Aug. 29, Sep. 19, Oct. 2, Cultivar 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 Average Plateau 7 7 7 7 7 7.0 Patriot 7 7 5 6 5 6.0 ‘BAR 1CD3’ 7 7 8 7 6 7.0 Celebration 7 7 6 6 6 6.4 Tifton 419 7 7 7 6 6 6.6 Genetic Color (9 = dark green) Jul. 11, Jul. 22, Aug. 29, Sep. 19, Oct. 2, Cultivar 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 Average Plateau 7 8 8 8 7.6 7.7 Patriot 6 6 7 6 6.2 6.2 ‘BAR 1CD3’ 7 8 8 7 7.4 7.5 Celebration 7 7 7 8 7.1 7.2 Tifton 419 6 6 6 6 6.1 6.0

-   Table 9 shows a comparison of the number of seed heads produced and     percent ground cover. Data was collected in the summer and fall of     2008 from plots planted on Jun. 13, 2008 in Wharton, Tex. Column one     shows the cultivar name, column two shows the seed head number on     Jul. 11, 2008 with a score of nine (9) equaling the highest number     of seed heads produced, column three shows the seed head number on     Jul. 22, 2008 with a score of nine (9) equaling the highest number     of seed heads produced, column four shows the seed head number on     Aug. 29, 2008 with a score of nine (9) equaling the highest number     of seed heads produced, column five shows the seed head number on     Sep. 19, 2008 with a score of nine (9) equaling the highest number     of seed heads produced, column six shows the seed head number on     Oct. 2, 2008 with a score of nine (9) equaling the highest number of     seed heads produced, column seven shows the average number of seed     head produced, column eight shows the percent ground cover on Jul.     11, 2008, column nine shows the percent ground cover on Jul. 22,     2008, column ten shows the percent ground cover on Aug. 29, 2008,     column eleven shows the percent ground cover on Sep. 19, 2008, and     column twelve shows the percent ground cover on Oct. 2, 2008.

TABLE 9 Comparison of Seed Head Production and Percent Ground Cover Data is from Wharton, Texas. Planting date: Jun. 13, 2008 Seed Head Number (9 = highest number of seed heads produced) Jul. 11, Jul. 22, Aug. 29, Sep. 19, Oct. 2, Cultivar 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 Average Plateau 0 0 3 3 3 1.8 Patriot 0 0 0 0 9 1.8 ‘BAR 1CD3’ 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Celebration 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Tifton 419 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Percent Ground Cover Jul. 11, Jul. 22, Aug. 29, Sep. 19, Oct. 2, Cultivar 2008 2008 2008 2008 2008 Plateau 35 75 100 100 100 Patriot 90 100 100 100 100 ‘BAR 1CD3’ 65 90 100 100 100 Celebration 70 95 100 100 100 Tifton 419 50 85 100 100 100

-   Table 10 shows a written comparison of various Bermuda grass     varieties when compared with ‘BAR 1CD3’. Data is from Wharton, Tex.,     with a planting date of Jun. 13, 2008. As shown in Table 10, ‘BAR     1CD3’ is distinguished from other Bermuda grass varieties by its     blue green color, very low vertical growth, tight and dense growth,     short leaf, little or no scalping when mowed, and no seed head     production.

TABLE 10 Comparison of Characteristics of Various Bermuda Grass Varieties Plateau Blue green color; low vertical growth; tight and dense; short leaf; little or no scalping when mowed; some seed heads produced. Patriot Yellow green color; tall vertical growth; thin in turf; course leaf; scalped when mowed; numerous seed heads produced. ‘BAR 1CD3’ Blue green color; very low vertical growth; tight and dense; short leaf; little or no scalping when mowed; no seed heads produced. Celebration Blue green color; medium vertical growth; thin; coarse leaf. Tifton 419 Light green in color; tall growth; thin, fine leaf blades, scalping when mowed.

-   An analysis of the genetic relationship between ‘BAR 1CD3’ and     various Bermuda grass samples was conducted in the fall of 2009.     Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) markers were used in     the analysis. From each DNA-sample, three independent EcoRI/MseI     pre-amplifications were prepared. This rendered a total of eighteen     pre-amplifications for analysis and allowed a check of the     reproducibility of the AFLP-protocol when the same DNA-sample was     used repeatedly for analysis. For each pre-amplification, eight AFLP     primer combinations were used. Six primer combinations were used as     taught by Wu et al., Genome 47:689-696 (2004) and are shown in     Table 11. Primer combination e-GCTG/m-CAG, as taught by Wu et     al. (2004) was replaced by the primer combination e-ACA/m-CAG to     avoid the necessity to carry out two preamplifications for each     sample in triplicate. Primer combination e-AGT/m-CAG was replaced by     primer combination e-ACA/m-CAT, to avoid unnecessary delay in the     completion of the analysis. An ABI Prism 3130x1 capillary sequencer     was used for the AFLP-fragment separation and detection. GeneScan     500 Rox labelled size standard was loaded in each run to allow     fragment sizing. The fluorescent AFLP fingerprints were scored using     Genemapper v. 3.7 (Applied Biosystems) and the presence or absence     of each marker in each sample was recorded. As shown in Table 12,     the presence or absence of each marker was used to construct a     scoring table where a score of 1 equalled presence and a score of 0     equalled absence for data analysis. Genetic similarity between pairs     of samples was estimated using the percentage of shared AFLP bands.     This coefficient varies between 0 (complete dissimilarity) and 1     (complete similarity). Calculations were carried out in STATISTICA     v8.0 (Stat Soft Inc., Tulsa, Okla., USA).

TABLE 11 Restriction Enzymes and Selective Nucleotides Used, Primer Combinations as cited by Wu et al. (2004) EcoRI MseI PC1* ACT CAG PC2* AAC CAG PC3 ACA CAG PC4* ACT CAT PC5* AAC CAT PC6* ACT CAC PC7* AAC CAC PC8 ACA CAT

-   As shown in Table 11, eight primer combinations were used. These     eight primer combinations rendered 373 polymorphic AFLP-bands for     analysis. The fingerprints generated for replicated samples were     compared. In most cases three repetitions were available for     analysis for a given primer combination. Only a few differences were     encountered when replicated samples were compared: for Patriot only     one AFLP-band (PC8_a17) was not consistent among the three     replications. For ‘BAR 1CD3’ only the AFLP-band PC3_a135 was not     consistent among the three replications and for Tifway 419 only the     AFLP-band PC7_a135 was not consistent. For Tifdwarf, Celebration,     TifEagle and ‘P-18’ the replicates were identical. This demonstrated     a high reliability of the results obtained. -   As shown in Table 12, the analysis shows that the Bermuda grass     varieties Tifdwarf, TifEagle and ‘P-18’ display an extremely high     degree of similarity. No single polymorphism was detected between     samples Tifdwarf and TifEagle among the 373 AFLP-bands screened. One     single polymorphism (for band PC6_a129) was found between Tifdwarf     and TifEagle, on the one side, and ‘P-18’ on the other side. -   The genetic relationships among the Bermuda grass samples tested     have also been represented using Unweighted Pair Group Method with     Arithmetic Mean clustering UPGMA (FIG. 2). As shown in FIG. 2, four     clusters are evident with Tifway 419 being the most dissimilar, and     TifDwarf, TifEagle, and ‘P-18’ being the most similar of the group.

TABLE 12 Analysis of the Genetic Similarity of Bermuda Grass Varieties Tifway ‘BAR 1CD3’ Patriot TifDwarf TifEagle ‘P-18’ 419 ‘BAR 1CD3’ 0.000 0.485 0.606 0.610 0.614 0.608 Patriot 0.485 0.000 0.408 0.412 0.416 0.535 TifDwarf 0.606 0.408 0.000 0.004 0.008 0.577 TifEagle 0.610 0.412 0.004 0.000 0.004 0.581 ‘P-18’ 0.614 0.416 0.008 0.004 0.000 0.581 Tifway 419 0.608 0.535 0.577 0.581 0.581 0.000 

1. A new and distinct Bermuda grass plant as described and illustrated herein. 